Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Joe Paterno Press Release/Facebook Post

Joe Paterno

CONTACT: Desiree Y. Torres
                    813-481-0415
                    desiree.torres@snhu.edu








Joe Paterno is not dead…yet!

What if someone were told they were “dead” before it really happened?

STATE COLLEGE, PA - One of the many people who were fooled by an inaccuracy in Joe Paterno’s death read a tweet sent from Onward State, the student website which covers stories at Penn State University, on Saturday January 21, 2012.  The public was told Paterno passed away a whole day before he actually did. Big time media outlets such as CBSSports.com and the Huffington Post read this tweet from one of the Onward State writers and spread the word on their sites before doing any research about the true story. Essentially, these sites killed Paterno off publicly prior to him really being gone.   

This incident is a perfect example of what not to do when a story breaks. Had each news outlet done their own investigation, they would have known that the original sources of Onward State were considered credible because of an e-mail. An e-mail that anyone could have sent. The writers of this student website did not follow the journalism rules of ethics, but that’s no excuse for professional media companies to follow suit.


With social media growing more each day, errors such as this one are likely to happen more online versus than in print. When printing a newspaper or magazine, the reporters are forced to delve deeper for accurate information because once something has been printed, it is harder to take back. Online content can be deleted just as quickly as it is posted. There are only so many retractions a journalist can publish before their credibility is shot.  

###

Facebook Post:  The Tweet heard around the world…the football world that is!

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Social Media Tools

The three Social Media Tools I chose to use are Twitter, LinkedIn, and a Blog. Here are the links for each site:


  • Twitter: twitter.com (my twitter handle is @Eve210)
  • LinkedIn: linkedin.com (find me under Desiree Torres)


Out of all of the social media tools listed on the aids.gov website, I believe the following are the best ones to reach audiences most effectively: blogs, mobile, photo sharing sites, podcasts, social network sites, text messaging, twitter, and video sharing sites. Each of these engines can be very successful in reaching the masses because of the speed, accessibility, and simplicity of each tool. Think about it…all of these tools can be created, edited, and used on your smart phone which means a person can have access to the community with one simple device. As with any media site, people need followers and or a group of people with whom they can reach out to and share their tweets, videos, and photos; however, all it really takes is a small group of people to share your information with their friends and families. If the material you want to share is interesting and eye-catching enough, more and more people will share it with their circle of contacts.


I think each tool can be used differently depending on what type of audience you are trying to connect with. For example, I use my Twitter account solely for current events. By signing onto Twitter, I’m able to get updates on my favorite magazines and celebrities, while also staying up-to-date with the happenings of the world through CNN, USA Today, and President Obama’s administration. While completing this assignment, I wondered why on the aids.gov website, Twitter isn’t considered a ‘social networking site’. It’s similar to Facebook in that a person can post their status and people can choose to respond and follow them. I wonder who defines ‘social media’ and if I’m alone in my thinking about Twitter. My LinkedIn account is used for professional reasons. I have over 100 legitimate business connections. These contacts were made through years of managing volunteers, collaborating with co-workers, and building a reliable reputation throughout my career. I truly think a site such as LinkedIn can help people who are trying to relocate to a new state and need to find work or even if they are simply going into a new career where they currently reside. Remember, the more people you know in different professional fields, the better access you can have within these fields. Obviously a person would need the knowledge and experience to get the job they seek, but knowing someone in a company may allow you to get your foot in the door for an opportunity you may not have normally had.



As far as blogging, I’m still very new to it. I only created a blog for this class and I’ve really enjoyed sharing my opinion with others. Will I continue to blog once this class is over? I’m not sure. I’ve never thought of myself as very creative, so I honestly wouldn’t know what to blog about. On the other hand, if you are a person with a lot of knowledge about different hobbies or information you want to share, then blogging is the way to go. I think it’s a very comfortable and informal way to share your thoughts and opinions without crossing over too many professional boundaries. If a person has a blog that others don’t agree with, it’s okay because people who don’t agree do not have to read the blog in question. However, at least the blogger has an outlet to get their thoughts and ideas out there. Sometimes it’s just want a person needs. Either way, all three of the social media tools I use are a great way to get a message across to many people at one time. This definitely beats the old days of having to write individual letters to friends and family. Now, one post/status update says it all! 

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Unrestricted Web Publishing



The article I chose to write about is Europe Isn’t Happy About Facebook’s News Feed Experiment, which I found in Time Magazine. There were a few sources I was able to track to authenticate this story. These sources are Facebook themselves, Ireland’s Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, and The Information Commissioner’s Office of Britain. Following the” Criteria to Evaluate the Credibility of WWW Resources” each of these websites are legit. The author who wrote this article is Mirren Gidda and she is a well-known author for Time, as well as, other publications. As far as whether or not the story regarding Facebook is current, I was able to find more articles in the NY Times, USA Today, and CNN, all of which are credible sources. Each of these stories came out within the last week or so.

The only way this story can be involved with unrestricted web publishing is if bloggers or other writers decide to take it out of context and spread false information. By adding opinions in with facts, this article can potentially take a different turn than it was meant to. Facebook is currently under investigation for this event in which some people feel it violated the privacy act. If the public, which right now I consider non-experts on the subject, decide to put their own spin on the story, it will then become an unreliable piece of information. As of today, this information is legit and as long as it’s shared on social media through bona fide sites, I think the impact will be fine.

Reference

Gidda, Mirren. 2014. Europe Isn’t Happy About Facebook’s News Feed Experiment. Retrieved from